The murder of Rosie Palmer was committed in Hartlepool, County Durham on 30 June 1994. Three-year-old Rose Palmer was abducted, raped and murdered after buying an ice pop from an ice cream van only 20 metres from her home. Her partially-clothed and mutilated body was found in a house 50 metres from her own on 3 July 1994.

It was the third visit to the premises by police during the inquiry, and the second time that it had been searched. The occupant was Shaun Anthony Armstrong, who had a history of psychiatric problems and was widely disliked in the neighbourhood, where he was known as “Tony the Pervert”. In March 1993 a social worker had warned that Armstrong was “likely to be a risk to any child he comes into contact with” but Durham County Council failed to act on the report. He was convicted of the child’s murder on 27 July 1995 and was sentenced to life imprisonment. As the law stands he will not go onto the sex offenders register when he is released possibly this year (2013), because he was not convicted of a sexual offence

The abduction and subsequent murder

On 30 June 1994 Rosie Palmer had been playing at a neighbour’s house in Henrietta Street, Hartlepool after being collected from nursery school by her stepfather, John Thornton.

At approximately 15:30 Gary Amerigo, the local ice cream vendor, arrived and Palmer went to ask Thornton if she could have money to buy an ice pop. She was the only customer and after serving her the ice cream man drove out of the street. Amerigo said later “Only Rosie came up to my van that day.

She didn’t have enough money but I gave her the ice-cream anyway. She seemed just her usual self, bright and cheerful.”Armstrong – who was celebrating his 32nd birthday that day – abducted her as she walked away after making her purchase.She was considered a “sensible” child who would not “wander off” and it was approximately two hours before her stepfather realised she was no longer at the neighbour’s or playing outside the house.Thornton and other local residents began to search the local area for her, and at 20:45 reported her as a missing person to the police.

The police search operation was headed by Detective Superintendent Doug Smith of Cleveland Police and involved door-to-door inquiries, tracker dogs and local volunteers. Warehouses, industrial buildings, and disused buildings around the adjacent docks were searched while HM Coastguard, a police helicopter and a RNLI lifeboat searched the sea and shore.Police first called at Armstrong’s flat on 1 July while conducting initial door-to-door inquiries during which residents were asked to answer a questionnaire aimed at tracing her last movements.

On 2 July they returned while carrying out “cursory searches” of houses in the area. On 3 July Armstrong was spoken to by two detectives who noticed that his previously “co-operative, friendly and helpful” demeanour had changed, and that he now appeared “very shifty, on edge and looking very worried.”

Acting on suspicion, the detectives arrested Armstrong and a second search of his first-floor flat was conducted.The child’s mutilated body was found in a bin liner inside an airing cupboard in the flat. Her shorts and underwear were found nearby in a separate bag. Armstrong denied any involvement in the crime and claimed that “someone else must have put the body there.”

Shaun “Tony” Armstrong – Events of that day

Shaun Armstrong (born 30 June 1962, Easington, County Durham) had moved in to a council-owned flat on Frederic Street in August 1993. He was unemployed, with a dependency on alcohol and prescription drugs, and had a long history of criminal activity.

He had been investigated in relation to sex offences against children, although never charged. He had also been diagnosed as having a personality disorder and a psychopathic personality. He had obtained the flat after his psychiatric consultant wrote a supporting letter to the Housing Department stating that he was “vulnerable”.

On the estate he was called “Tony the Pervert” and was generally considered “a loner, disliked or distrusted by all those who knew him.”

On 30 June 1994 Armstrong, who had been drunk “for two days solid, partying for [his] birthday, at different people’s houses and pubs and clubs,” arrived home by taxi at 15:30, about the same time that the ice cream van pulled in to Henrietta Street.

The rear of Armstrong’s flat backed on to the cul-de-sac where Palmer purchased her ice cream. Post mortem examination determined that she was dead by 16:30, although pathologists were unable to give a specific cause of death due to the condition of her body. Det. Supt. Smith told a news conference: “She had been severely sexually assaulted. That is a possible cause of death – the actual injury itself.”

At around 16:30 Armstrong called in at a local shop where he said he was going to “help look for the little girl who had vanished” although at this time he was the only person who knew she was missing. The shopkeeper noticed blood on Armstrong’s hand, who said he had been bitten by his dog, despite the absence of any wound.

Armstrong then took his dog and a bottle of cider to the nearby beach and began running in and out of the sea for two hours until neighbours reported him to the police who arrived and told him to go home


Armstrong was charged with murder and remanded in custody to await trial at Leeds Crown Court. He planned to feign mental illness and plead guilty to manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility.

However while on remand he had revealed this plan in a letter to a man called Bernard O’Mahoney – who had posed as a woman in hope of getting a written confession from the killer. This letter was given to police and shown to the jury at Armstrong’s trial, and he quickly changed his plea to guilty of murder.

Armstrong was sentenced to life imprisonment on 28 July 1995. The trial judge, Mr Justice Ognall, did not make any recommendation as to how many years Armstrong should serve before he could be considered for parole, though in a High Court ruling of May 2006, Mr Justice Crane set the minimum term to 16 years, “subject to a deduction of 12 months and 21 days for the period on remand”, meaning Armstrong will be eligible for parole in July 2010

Armstrong since 1995

A report in the psychiatric care given to Armstrong was published in June 1996, two years after he murdered Rosie Palmer, and the local Health Authority criticised the standard of care as “inadequate and full of shortcomings”, but added that the murder of Rosie Palmer “could not have been predicted”.

In June 1997, Rosie’s mother Beverley launched a £200,000 compensation claim against Tees health authority and Hartlepool and East Durham NHS trust, alleging negligence for allowing Armstrong to be released from their care. This is thought to be the first damages claim against a health authority or NHS trust by a relative of someone murdered by a released patient.

The claim was struck out in February 1998 by High Court official Master Hodgson who ruled that Armstrong had made no direct threat against Rosie and her family. He said: “In the absence of such a specific threat I think it is impossible, as the law currently stands, for me to hold that the hospital in these circumstances owes effectively a duty (of care) to the world at large.”

In June 1999 the case was heard again at the Court of Appeal. On 1 July 1999 Lord Justice Stuart-Smith upheld the previous High Court ruling that there was no connection between the health authority or the hospital and Rosie.

After a number of years during which very little was reported about the Rosie Palmer murder case, Armstrong returned to the headlines in September 2001 when he was granted Legal Aid to pursue a £15,000 compensation claim against Bernard O’Mahoney for “breach of confidence”. Armstrong’s solicitors backed up the case by claiming that O’Mahoney had pretended to be a woman and allowed police to see a written statement (the letter in which Armstrong admitted to killing Rosie Palmer, as well as his plan to feign mental illness) which was supposed to be kept secret.

The case was dropped in June 2002 after Armstrong decided he no longer wanted to pursue O’Mahoney for damages. Armstrong also dropped his bid to prevent O’Mahoney from publishing a book – Flowers in God’s Garden – which included a section about Shaun Armstrong and the Rosie Palmer murder. By this stage, the proceedings had already cost thousands of pounds worth of taxpayers’ money.

In March 2010, with Armstrong’s earliest possible release date just four months away, Rosie Palmer’s mother Beverley Yates oversaw the launch of a campaign in Hartlepool for Shaun Armstrong to be placed on the sex offender’s register when and if he is paroled – as the law stands he will not go onto the register once released, because he was not convicted of a sexual offence